Name: Joshua H. Grabar
Item: Joshua H. Grabar
Author: jgrabar

Bio

Joshua H. Grabar has extensive experience as counsel in complex commercial litigation in state and federal courts throughout the nation, with a particular concentration and emphasis in individual and class action litigation under state and federal antitrust laws, federal securities laws, and state consumer protection laws.

Mr. Grabar has also represented plaintiffs and defendants in a broad range of other commercial litigation, including breach of contract litigation, litigation involving claims for coverage and indemnification under Directors and Officers liability insurance policies, disputes involving business torts and other unfair and deceptive business practices, claims involving alleged breach of fiduciary duty and misuse of corporate assets by corporate officers and directors, and claims involving private and public sector employees with respect to whistleblower protection laws.

Mr. Grabar also advises individuals, business owners and corporations on matters concerning antitrust compliance, retention of antitrust claims and recoveries, and consumer protection law compliance issues.

Mr. Grabar is a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania (B.A. 1995) and the Villanova University School of Law (J.D. 1998), where he served as an Associate Editor of the Villanova Law Review. Mr. Grabar authored the publication "Antol v. Esposto: The Third Circuit Expands Preemption Under The Labor Management Relations Act," 42 Vill. L. Rev. 1995 (1997).

Mr. Grabar was admitted to both the Pennsylvania and the New Jersey bars in 1998. He is a member of the American, Pennsylvania and Philadelphia Bar Associations and has been admitted pro hac vice in federal courts nationally.

The cases in which Mr. Grabar has worked or continues to work include:

In re Inductors Antitrust Litigation, Case No. 18-cv-198-EJD. An antitrust class action alleging price-fixing by the major manufactures of electronic component parts known as inductors.

In Re: Generic Pharmaceuticals Pricing Antitrust Litig., 2:16-MD-2724-CMR (E.D.PA.). An antitrust class action alleging that generic drug manufacturers conspired to fix and raise prices for numerous generic drugs.

In Re: Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litig., 2:13-CV-20000 (N.D. Ala.). An antitrust class action filed on behalf of Blue Cross and Blue Shield subscribers alleging conspiracy in violation of the Sherman Act.

Arielle Anderson v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, 18-cv-1378 (E.D.Pa.). A class action against PHEAA for illegally extending student loan payoff durations to generate extra servicing fees and interest payments.

Hayden v. Gennex Media, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 4:18-cv-883 (S.D. Tex.). A putative antitrust class action on behalf of direct purchasers of customized promotional products

Pensacola Motor Sales, Inc. d/b/a Bob Tyler Toyota, Inc. v. CDK Global, LLC and The Reynolds and Reynolds Company, 1:18-cv-01402 (N.D. Ill.). A putative class action on behalf of automobile dealerships against Defendants for violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2 with respect to Data Managment Systems.

In Re: Equifax, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litig., 1:17-md-02800-TXT (N.D.GA).

In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litig., MDL 1917, 3:07-cv-05944 (N.D. Cal.). An antitrust action alleging price-fixing of cathode ray tubes and finished products containing cathode ray tubes, by the major manufacturers of these products with recoveries exceeding $224 million.

In re Steel Antitrust Litig., 08-cv-5214 (N.D. Ill.). An antitrust action alleging market allocation and supply restriction of steel by the world’s major manufacturers of steel with recoveries exceeding $163 million.

In re EPDM Antitrust Litig., MDL No. 1542 (D. Conn.). An antitrust action alleging price-fixing of Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer with recoveries exceeding $100 million.

In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litig., 05-CV-666 (E.D. Pa). An antitrust action alleging price-fixing of Hydrogen Peroxide with recoveries exceeding $97 million.

Alco Industries, Inc. v. DuPont Dow Elastomers, LLC, 1:04 CV 00588 (D.D.C.). An antitrust action alleging price-fixing of Polychloroprene Rubber with recoveries exceeding $36 million.

In re Polychloroprene Rubber (CR) Antitrust Litig., 3:05-MD-01642 (D. Conn.). An antitrust action alleging price-fixing of Polychloroprene Rubber with recoveries exceeding $15 million.

In re Methyl Methacrylate (MMA) Antitrust Litig., 2:06-MD-01768 (E.D. Pa.) (recoveries exceeding $15 million).

In re Mercedes-Benz Antitrust Litig., 99-CV-431 (AMW) (D.N.J.) (recoveries exceeding $17 million).

In re Rubber Chemicals Antitrust Litig., 03-CV-1496 (N.D. Cal.) (recoveries exceeding $250 million).

Joshua H. Grabar

Find Featured Recipients

Attorney Acceptance Form

Attorney Login

Joshua H. Grabar

Login

Sign up for